This is not the first time that we’ve turned our attention to John Stossel on Rebel, but we dearly hope that it will be the last. His latest “piece” is deceptively called “Anything that’s peaceful” and in it he creatively twists the word liberal to mean that almost anything should be allowed.
For example the presently illegal practice of selling human organs:
“95,000 Americans are waiting for organ transplants. Thousands die while waiting. Legalizing the sale of organs would give people the choice of life, while allowing sellers to choose cash over an extra kidney.”
Yes wouldn’t it be wonderful if a new breed of “businessmen” were allowed to swindle poor people out of their own organs, luring them into deals they may not even understand with promises of quick, easy money. A new utopia in the making.
He also turns his attention toward the FDA, that bastion of liberal plotting and scheming:
“The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decides what you may put in your own body. A truly liberal FDA would acknowledge that adults own their bodies and can decide for themselves what risks are appropriate. That would give consumers more choice. But liberals want the FDA to be tougher.”
Let’s just abolish the FDA then and return to the days when patent medicines weren’t required to list their ingredients, and could range from useless placebos to opium to outright poison. Yes let’s return to those days. Or maybe we could simply end up like China, with tainted baby formula routinely making it to supermarket shelves. Fuck the FDA, they work to undermine freedom by demanding things like evidence that a product works as advertised.
To be fair to Mr. Stossel, he does render one valid point in this diatribe, and that is related to the Employee Free Choice Act. This act seeks to do away with secret ballots when voting to form unions, and could make it easier for workers to be coerced into forming unions that they don’t really want. This actually is an outrage and should not be allowed. Secret ballots should remain as sacred as the vote itself.
Now that we’ve thrown Mr. Stossel a bone, let’s conclude with arguably the most ridiculous statement of his rant, as related to the Fairness Doctrine, “Fairness here means depriving people of the choice of all-conservative radio.”
Depriving people–of the choice–of all-conservative radio. That doesn’t sound like there is a choice, in fact that sounds as if there are no other options. All-conservative radio. Is that the liberal vision Stossel espouses?
Sure seems to be.


