Rethinking health care

By Chief Contributor Frederic J. Rohner

I was all ready to post the following idea regarding health care this morning when, to my utter shock and surprise, I read this piece from the Huffington Post (via RealClearPolitics) in which contributor Bill Maher basically echoes the exact sentiment I will present to you.

Go ahead and read it, I’ll wait. Done? Good.

Why is it that health care is a for profit industry? How is a doctor any different than a police officer or a firefighter? All tend to us in times of emergency, albeit in varying degrees. All describe their occupations as “callings” more than just a way to make a buck. All serve the public good, and as such, none should be for profit businesses.

With all the debate raging and centered around health care and the prospect of “socialized medicine,” the thought occurred to me that we really must rethink health care and the way the entire industry is constructed. Critics of “socialized medicine” and the “single payer option” have pointed to the fear of government bureaucrats getting between them and their doctors, but isn’t that what is already happening? Why is a corporate bureaucrat any different or more desirable than one from the government? If doctors come to be thought of in the same vein as police officers, firefighters, and even soldiers– that is, government employees who serve the public–then why would we need paper pushers to decide who gets what coverage, who gets denied, or who has to die waiting for treatment? Think of it this way: does a police officer demand payment from you for arresting the person who mugged you? Do you have to fill out pages of paperwork before your house fire is extinguished?

No. So then why do we currently do these things for the people who revive, cure and heal us from knife wounds, broken bones, and third degree burns?

You want to cut costs for health care? Then stop making money off of it. You want to expand health coverage? Then make it truly accessible for all, make it non-profit. Don’t take over the insurance companies, take over the hospitals.

The only entity or person hurt by this would be the insurance companies and the people who make money from human suffering.

And don’t give me that bullshit about stifling innovation. You mean to tell me that no innovations have been made in catching criminals? You really want to argue that firefighters are worse at putting out fires than they were twenty years ago?

A health insurance company is merely a parasitic middleman. It’s time to cut out the middleman. It’s time to rethink health care altogether.

Science is back. Plus, floating cities?

Both articles from CNN.

President Obama reversed George W. Bush’s policies towards stem cell research Monday. This means that federal funding will now be able to be applied towards this vital research which may be able to make drastic advances in the treatment of many now incurable diseases and injuries, from spinal trauma to cancer. This (hopefully) also marks an attempt by the new President to  seperate science from political ideology. We’ll see how that works out.

Also, engineers are discussing a prototype floating city to be located off the coast of California. The Seasteading Institute says it will use technology loosely based on oil rigs to create cities at sea built upon floating platforms. In addition to testing the limits of oil rig technology, the Seasteading Institute wishes to use the floating city to experiment with new forms of government. Weird.

Palin May Ruin McCain’s Chances (but not for the reason you think)

By Chief Contributor Frederic J. Rohner

By pretty much all accounts, Gov. Sarah Palin’s acceptance speech at the GOP convention was a wild success. She gave a great speech, one full of withering attacks on the Democratic party in general and Sen. Barack Obama specifically. Some have pointed to the tone of the speech and said its level of sarcasm was over the top. Others have pointed out the factual errors in her speech as well as Rudy Giulianni’s and Mike Huckabee’s. But two things are certain, the GOP base finally has a reason to get excited about this election and Sarah Palin is a rising star in the Republican party. Which is why she could prove to be the undoing for Sen. John McCain’s presidential bid.

Palin had to deliver a great speech last night, and she did. But tonight is John McCain’s night to present his case to the American people, and he will find himself being measured against the outstanding performance of his 44 year old VP pick.

The problem with this is the fact that John McCain is not a very good public speaker. He’s great in front of an audience at townhall meetings where he gets to engage in a lot of back-and-forth with the crowd, but in front of a teleprompter McCain seems perpetually uncomfortable, his delivery always stilted and choppy. There’s no way he can match the smooth performance Palin gave in her acceptance speech.

The other problem which lies ahead for McCain is the fact that Sarah Palin is a darling to the conservative wing of the Republican party. She favors overturning Roe v. Wade, she’s against naming polar bears as an endangered species, she wants to “drill, drill, drill,” she’s a card carrying member of the NRA, and she believes creationism belongs in the classroom alongside evolutionary science. Many of these positions have been championed by McCain recently, but many GOP members have not forgotten that McCain’s “maverick” philosophy have put him at odds with his own party on many occasions. This is why it took the nomination of Gov. Palin to get the GOP base so excited. And it showed last night.

Gov. Sarah Palin’s performance has had the effect of setting a very high bar for Sen. McCain. McCain must give a better speech tonight than (arguably) he’s given thus far in the election process, and he must pepper his speech with enough policy specifics to satisfy the press, who have so far characterized the Republican National Convention as a referendum on Obama. But most importantly, he has to create as much excitement as Sarah Palin did last night– a pretty tall order.

And if he does not, Republicans may find themselves in the same position the Democrats did in 2004, when they witnessed another monumental speech by a rising political star. The Republicans may wonder why they chose McCain for their nominee, and they may find that they really like “the new kid” a lot more.

Bonnie Erbe: Poster Child for Sour Grapes, New Frontrunner for Spin Of The Year

Apparently Bonnie Erbe has not quite gotten over the fact that her favorite candidate, Hillary Clinton, lost the race for the democratic nomination. Not only that, she must not have gotten the memo that Sen. Clinton has since endorsed presumptive nominee Barack Obama. Bonnie Erbe has also officially unseated Marie Cocco and Lorne Gunter, taking her thrown as Queen of Spin. For this week, at least, she sits at the top of a very exclusive list, but her jaw-droppingly false column based solely on exaggeration, may just end up winning Spin Of The Year honors as well.

Here’s her piece entitled “Barack Obama, Serial Flip Flopper.”

We all knew the infamous flip flopper accusation would be thrown out there at some point in this election. Because human beings have a tendency to change their minds every once in a while, it was inevitable that one or both of the presidential candidates would be accused of this “sin.” What was completely unexpected was that it would be a pundit from the candidate’s own party who would throw the first stone.

And that’s just what Bonnie Erbe has done. Obviously still reeling from the emotional trauma that was Sen. Clinton’s failed presidential bid, Ms. Erbe has produced nothing short of a hatchet job on Sen. Obama. Here’s the quote that got us laughing here at Rebel:

“From where I sit, flip-flopping is an unbeatable addiction for Obama. For McCain, by comparison, it’s an occasional foible.”

Wow, that’s a bold statement. But where’s the evidence? Can’t we the readers have some sort of list so we can sort out whose flip flops are worse? What we get as readers is a list of Barack Obama’s flip flop greatest hits with nary a mention of the radical change Sen. McCain has undergone in the last few months in terms of policy. So, eventhough we may be stalwart supporters of Sen. Obama’s presidential bid, because we are fair at Rebel, we have chosen to present you with a more comprehensive list of flip flops than Ms. Erbe deemed necessary. We will use her list for Obama, but our list of McCain’s flip flops has been generated almost entirely from recent memory (we had to look up a few dates).

Sen. Obama (D-Ill.):

• He [Obama] ripped Hillary Clinton for months for voting to list Iran’s Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization. Days after Clinton conceded, Obama flipped and said he supported the definition.

• Obama repeatedly vowed to meet with various heads of terror states—most notably Ahmadinejad of Iran—”without preconditions.” Then, with the nomination in sight, he zigzagged: “There’s no reason why we would necessarily meet with Ahmadinejad. He’s not the most powerful person in Iran.”

• In October, he supported NAFTA expansion. In March, campaigning in the Ohio primary, he called for a “reopening” of the trade pact’s terms. This week, he called his own primary rhetoric “overheated” and said NAFTA has had a positive effect on the US economy.

• Yesterday, after signaling opposition to nuclear power, he told Democratic governors he’s open to expanding it.”

Sen. McCain (R-Ariz.):

• McCain was against Bush’s tax cuts before he decided to support them during his presidential campaign. On January 5, 2000 he told The Washington Post, “I’m not giving tax cuts for the rich.” The same day he told The LA Times, “I don’t believe the wealthiest 10% of Americans should get 60% of the tax breaks. I think the lowest 10% should get the breaks.” But at a republican debate in Boca Raton, Fla. in Jan. 2008, McCain said, “I think it’s very important that we make the Bush tax cuts permanent.”

• McCain referred to Jerry Falwell and preachers of his ilk as “agents of intolerance” in 2002, but while campaigning during the republican primaries, he suddenly changed his tune and began courting ”agents of intolerance” for their endorsements, most notably John Haggee, the Catholic bashing hate monger whose endorsement McCain actively sought and then quickly disavowed.

• McCain used to be one of the biggest supporters of campaign finance reform on Capitol Hill (remember McCain-Feingold?). Now that he has won his party’s nomination for president, Sen. McCain is opposed to legislation he helped pass.

• John McCain, a former POW who was tortured while held in the Hanoi Hilton, has repeatedly stressed his opposition to torture. However, when the Intelligence Authorization Bill was brought to the floor of the Senate in February of this year with a provision banning the use of waterboarding, Sen. McCain voted to uphold President Bush’s veto.

Now that a more balanced representation of the evidence has been presented, whose list of flip flops is more egregious, and, for that matter, whose list is even worth compiling?

After shilling for Hillary for the past few months, Bonnie Erbe is obviously unable to switch gears and focus on the general election. Op-Ed writers with a vendetta towards a certain candidate or an ax to grind in general are a dime a dozen, and Ms. Erbe has shown herself to be no different. What sets her apart though is the amateurish way she has gone about publishing this attack piece. She obviously made no attempt at writing a fair article, she has no semblance of balance, and, because of this, she has lost all credibility.

At least she’s earned her place in Spin Of The Week history as the most blatent offender yet.

If you would like to add to either candidate’s list of flip flops, feel free to use the comments section.  And if you think Bonnie Erbe is an idiot, read her coworker, John Mashek’s piece on the same topic with a completely different outlook.

bing bong

Published in:  on January 30, 2008 at 2:43 pm Leave a Comment

Drunk History

Published in:  on January 9, 2008 at 10:00 am Leave a Comment
Tags: , , ,

FDA to clear cloned livestock for consumers

Published in:  on January 7, 2008 at 9:57 am Leave a Comment
Tags: , ,

Pakistan elections delayed until February

Giuliani has a new ad! And it’s full of lies.

Check out Mayor Rudy’s new tough guy ad, then read about it in this Salon article.

http://www.salon.com/politics/roadies/2007/12/05/rudy_tough_guy/index.html?source=rss&aim=/politics/roadies

Today is the Day

Celebrate freedom and the headaches that come with it.

http://www.repealday.org/

Published in:  on December 5, 2007 at 11:33 am Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , ,